Risks and opportunities

As part of JSW Group's risk management process, risks related to its operations that may have a negative impact have been identified.

The key risks at JSW Group are risks in the following areas:

  • natural environment,
  • legal,
  • local community,
  • corporate governance,
  • operational activity and trade area,
  • finance,
  • strategic investments and development activities,

A risk register is kept, containing information on risk identified during the ERM System's implementation and updated in accordance with the ERM Policy and ERM Procedure.

RISKS AND HAZARDS

The occurrence of the armed conflict in Ukraine after the last day of the reporting period will not trigger greater commercial and financial risk in the Group in terms of business partners paying their liabilities. The Group does not collaborate with entities registered in Ukraine or Russia, nor does it make direct deliveries to the above destinations. The Group fulfills a coke supply contract to the Ukranian market through a domestic company; however, in connection with the current situation, coke supplies have been redirected to other markets. The lack of supplies of coal, coke and hydrocarbons from Russia and Ukraine may contribute to higher demand for the Group’s products.

Even though the armed conflict does not affect the current sales activity kept by the Group, one cannot rule out the possibility that if the conflict escalates, or if economic sanctions are imposed this would affect the Group’s operational and investment activity in the future. The possible disruptions are as follows:

  • severed or disrupted supply chains that may lead to limitations in the availability of raw materials from Ukraine and Russia that steel companies and coking plants need,
  • disruptions in production continuity or higher production costs,
  • limitations in the supplies of gas and coal from Russia,
  • disruptions in the supplies of electricity, including higher energy costs,
  • disruptions to logistics in ports due to higher overseas imports of raw materials, i.a. iron ore.
  • impact on the supply of metallurgical goods on the European market,
  • cyberattacks against IT resources leading to a data leak and disinformation,
  • hazards arising from the availability of employees.

The armed conflict’s impact on JSW’s business may be minimal or very extensive. Actions minimizing the materialization of a given risk will be undertaken on an ongoing basis depending on the circumstances that arise.

The table below presents the most material categories of risk identified in the Group. The risks described above are not the only exposures of the Group. There may be additional risk factors, which are currently unknown, or which are currently believed to be immaterial, that may also have a material and adverse effect on the Group’s operations, its financial performance and financial standing.

Risk level: low, middle, hight

Change in the level of risk assessment compared to 2019: decrease, no change, increase

RISKS RELATED TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION REGULATIONS

Risk description: The Group may be unable to comply with and act in compliance with provisions of law as amended in the future or such amendments may have an adverse effect on the Group’s business activity. Changes to the environmental protection law may force the Group to adapt to new requirements, including new permits or changes to the conditions of the current permits held by the Group. Such an obligation may require the Group to incur specific additional capital expenditures and may, by the same token, affect the Group’s financial standing by increasing the costs of its operations.

Risk response: constant oversight of environmental protection legal requirements and execution of necessary investment projects to meet all environmental requirements. Drafting of opinions and involvement in legislative work conducted at the national level on bills and amendments to existing regulations in the field of environmental protection. These actions create great opportunities to lower the level of risk and the costs of adaptation in the Group’s environmental operations and to new conditions.

ACOUSTIC CLIMATE HAZARDS

Risk description: decisions were issued as regards permitted noise level and decisions obligating the mines to limit the negative impact on the environment through reduction of the noise permeating the environment from the most onerous sources to the permissible level. Due to the still pending works on execution of the tasks associated with muffling the mine facilities as defined in the recovery decisions, there is a possibility that the permissible noise level will be breached.

Risk response: execution of the tasks associating with muffling the mine facilities specified in the recovery plans to the permissible level and carrying out measurements verifying the effectiveness of the adopted solutions.

HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH DUST AND GAS EMISSIONS INTO THE ATMSPOSHERE

Risk description: from 1 January 2025 the emissions standards (SO2, NOx) will become more stringent for existing fuel combustion sources with a nominal thermal capacity >5MW. For new sources, the more stringent standards will apply from the moment of their commissioning.

Risk response: constant monitoring of amendments to regulations, control of the application of, and compliance with, norms and decisions, periodic air emission measurements, calculations of the organization’s carbon footprint and its products, namely coal and coke. According to the decision made by the JSW Management Board, the organization’s carbon footprint in its general scope is published on JSW’s website.

HAZARDS ARISING FROM THE OCCURRENCE OF MINING DAMAGE ON THE SURFACE

Risk description: the risk exists due to the mining activity and underground mining operations. Pursuant to the binding provisions of law, a mining company is liable for damages caused as a result of a mine’s operation.

Risk response: coordination of activities associated with the preparation of the following: the geological works program, geological documentation, hydrogeological documentation, geological and engineering documentation, deposit development plan and operations plan, planning of locations at the risk of mining damage, oversight over compliance with provisions of concessions and environmental decisions, surveying and construction monitoring, monitoring the performance of repairs of mining damage and the provision added for this purpose, exclusion of land from development or a deposit from mining, preventive measures in order to ensure gravitational flow of surface waters, safeguarding the existing buildings and ongoing construction of new facilities erected on mine sites.

GOVERNMENT’S POLICY IN RESPECT OF HARD COAL MINING

Risk description: there is a threat caused by the line of the State policy that will be adopted in response to EU Directives. In accordance with the announcements of the government’s representatives, coal is to remain Poland’s primary energy fuel until 2050. By the same token, coking coal is a key raw material used in steel production.

Risk response: lobbying activity and petitioning to legislative institutions for changes aimed at streamlining the operation of the mining industry.

GOVERNMENT’S POLICY IN RESPECT OF THE POWER SECTOR AND ENERGY SECURITY

Risk description: risk may materialize in the long run. On 2 February 2021 a government document entitled Poland’s Energy Policy until 2040 was adopted.

Risk response: a government document for the energy industry - Poland’s Energy Policy Until 2040, petitioning to legislative institutions and participating in consultations of statutory amendments designed to increase energy security.
COSTS OF ENERGY IN THE LONG TERM

Risk description: the probability of this risk occurring has increased, among other reasons, in connection with the European Parliament ratifying the document entitled “Fit for 55”, which makes the restrictions on reducing the level of CO2 emissions and the limitations on the utilization of non-renewable energy raw materials more stringent. The EU is exerting pressure on rolling out modern and effective technologies in generating energy, reducing energy consumption through efficiency gains and increasing the importance of renewable energy generation. Prices on the energy market are hard to predict due to the major price swings on CO2 emission allowances, the growth in the prices for steam coal, gas, property rights (colors) and the rising share of other more expensive sources of energy.

Risk response: monitoring, market analyses, keeping track of trends regarding the impact of the prices of CO2 emission allowances (EU-ETS) on energy prices, selection of appropriate technologies and raw materials in accordance with industry requirements, contracting the purchase of a part of energy to cover the needs of the Group two years ahead under Polish Power Exchange (TGE) forward contracts, expansion of own electricity generation capacities based on methane-burning engines fired by methane captured from methane drainage during mining activity, re-definition of the electricity trading model to take account of TGE indices, maximizing of the consumption of energy generated in-house in the Group, investment in energy efficiency providing support of white certificates.

ALIGNING OPERATIONS WITH THE EU CLIMATE POLICY

Risk description: the protracted global pandemic and the limitations placed on gas exports by the Russian Federation have triggered a slowndown in the growth rate of the European economy and a substantial deterioration in the economic condition of most member states. A revision of the key priorities of the economic strategy is expected with efforts being focused on rebuilding the economy. The European Commission’s actions transcending the bounds of treaties and its commonplace violation of the rule of legality, the planned amendment of ETS to speed up the pace of reducing the number of emission allowances, the more stringent Market Stability Reserve (MSR) mechanism, permitting entities from outside the energy market to trade emission allowances and allowing emission allowances to be traded speculatively are contributing to limitations on Poland’s economic sovereignty and driving up the costs of transition while diminishing the competitiveness of the economy. The implementation of the European Green Deal will require huge financial expenditures that go beyond the state’s ability to pay, which may pose a threat to the implementation of the Paris Agreement, cause the growth rate to slow down, hinder the process of implementing the current climate policy and delay the achievement of climate neutrality in 2050, or make it impossible to achieve. The increase in energy prices and the threat of forfeiting continuity point to the state of losing energy security and call for undertaking special measures, e.g. suspending some of the regulations that have triggered or deepened the currently observed threats and retracting the decision on abandoning the usage of coal to generate energy.

Risk response: current analysis of the European Commission’s policy regarding the EU Climate Policy, including economic recovery, execution of the objective of obtaining climate neutrality in 2050 according to the road map for the European Green Deal, analysis of new programs, i.e. Fit for 55, amending legal regulations affecting energy prices, monitoring the prices of emission allowances and monitoring and active participation to support the work on devising industrial policy, active efforts towards systems and programs offsetting energy purchase costs by energy-intensive companies. In connection with the current situation, the necessity to rebuild the economy and the attainment of the climate neutrality target according to the road map (including the inclusion of CH4 to ETS, which is currently under consideration), it is necessary to get involved actively through our own activities and by supporting the actions taken by the Polish government to block the amendment of the ETS directive proposed under Fit for 55 and verify the other directives with an eye to their impact on energy security and the safety of residents.

WASTE AND BYPRODUCTS MANAGEMENT

Risk description: in connection with the actions taken to renew mining concessions, it is necessary to secure available reserves for utilization of mining waste for the term of the concession. Due to the long-term processes associated with, among others, changes to the studies of zoning conditions and directions of spatial planning, the execution of planned projects to secure available capacity of the places for waste utilization may be extended.

Risk response: ongoing monitoring of actions in respect of managing waste in the facilities for managing mine waste on the surface, reclamation and remediation of mining damage and the processes of acquisition of new sites.
RISK OF INCREASING THE SHARE OF ENERGY OBTAINED FROM RENEWABLE SOURCES AND OTHER ‘COLOR’ SOURCES

Risk description: making the requirements to increase the percentage of energy from renewable sources and other “colors” more stringent may lead to higher energy prices and cause businesses to lose their ability to compete on the global market and socially unacceptable increases in energy prices for individual customers. However, Group companies that are energy companies or an industrial offtaker are obligated to obtain and present for redemption to the President of the Energy Regulatory Authority (URE) certificates of electricity origin from renewable sources (referred to as green and blue certificates) or pay a substitution fee. There is a risk that the cost of obtaining such a certificate or the amount of the substitution fee will climb in the years to come. The investments run by the Group in respect of the economic utilization of methane will ramp up the quantity of energy origination from in-house generation, which will diminish the quantity of energy subject to the color system.

Risk response: ongoing tracking of amendments to color-related regulations and the related duties and updating the Group’s Strategy in this respect, analyzing the legal state, duties and privileges ensuing from the regulations in force.
SUCCESSION AND FILLING KEY POSITIONS

Risk description: the ability to conduct operations effectively may deteriorate if the Group unexpectedly loses key personnel in the organization and fails to attract new people.

Risk response: active HR policy to mitigate the risk associated with loss of human resources, high requirements regarding the qualifications for candidates for Management Board members and senior management staff, planning and preparation of successors for key positions.
RELATIONS WITH TRADE UNIONS AND COLLECTIVE DISPUTES

Risk description: failure to maintain proper social dialogue may have a material adverse impact on the Group’s activities. The risk of no agreement with the trade unions on key issues pertaining to work conditions and remuneration may have negative impact on financial performance, and consequently of the Company's image among business partners.

Risk response: appointment of an Auxiliary Steering Committee in JSW made up of representatives of JSW Management Board trade unions. The Committee’s scope of operation covers opinion-giving and analytical activities in terms of how JSW operates currently and the dialogue conducted with the trade unions.

ACCIDENTS AT WORK AND OTHER HAZARDS

Risk description: materialization of the risk is nearly certain during the next quarter as a technical, organizational or human factor, and as a result of occurrence of an unexpected event due to technical and natural hazards involved in mining operations.

Risk response: improvement of work safety and minimizing the occurrence of accidents and hazards due to technical or natural factors through the delivery of periodic training on OHS and job instruction, constant supervision and control of performance of work in compliance with prevailing principles and regulations, employees are acquainted with instructions, technologies, technical designs etc., preventive measures are taken following work accidents, OHS workstation audits for positions that are the most exposed to hazards.

EPIDEMIOLOGICAL THREAT

Risk description: in connection with the epidemiologic threat (SARS-CoV-2 virus) the probability of the occurrence of a threat is very high - threat to employee life and health, its impact on work organization, operations and, consequently, on financial performance.

Risk response: the Management Board adopts resolutions and issues directives to ensure the safety of the staff and mitigate the risk of the SARS-CoV-2 virus spreading. The key control mechanisms to minimize the consequences of the occurrence of risk have been rolled out and are in operation.

PR, MEDIA IMAGE, BRAND AND REPUTATION

Risk description: the risk resulting from an undesirable image of the Group among various stakeholder groups due to negative media coverage, data leaks, conflicts of interest, environmental aspects, social unrest, large scale disasters, breach of safety rules and other events adversely affecting the Group’s image. Desisting from communicating before JSW obtains a negative image in the media may contribute to a temporary, albeit unfavorable impact on JSW’s image.

Risk response: appropriate communication with stakeholders, daily media coverage monitoring, active communication with the external community through social media, close cooperation with the Ministry of State Assets to unify the mining sector’s information policy and enhance its image and the Group’s internal communication.

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

Risk description: The Group’s business activity may prompt disputes with local communities concerning the areas in which the Group conducts or intends to conduct operations.

Risk response: appointing a team whose task is coordinating, monitoring and initiating CSR activities, appointing the ESG Research and Reporting Task Force in the organizational structure of the Management Board Office, having the JSW Management Board and Supervisory Board adopt the Regulations of JSW’s Activity in Promotion, Advertising, Representation, Sponsoring, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Charitable Activity (Donations), setting up the JSW Foundation, adopting the JSW Group’s Sustainable Development Strategy in 2021-2030, improving mutual relations and avoiding conflicts with the trade unions.

INVESTOR RELATIONS

Risk description: the risk that the Group will not be viewed by investors as transparent and trustworthy. Such circumstances may contribute to a considerable decline in share value and loss of shareholder confidence.

Risk response: implementing a procedure to ensure proper performance of reporting duties, ongoing monitoring of publications and market opinions about the Group.

BREACH OF ETHICAL STANDARDS

Risk description: the risk that the Group’s employees take actions inconsistent with corporate ethical standards or that defining, implementing and enforcing these standards will not be effective and consistent with the Group’s objectives.

Risk response: legal regulations and legal safeguards set forth in contracts with third parties and internal legal regulations make it possible to prevent employees / subcontractors from committing actions and omissions or violations of the law on behalf of the Group.

EMBEZZLEMENT AND OTHER FRAUD

Risk description: given that the Group is a very large organization and very diverse in terms of the value and type of its assets, transactions and headcount, there is a risk of dishonest conduct of employees, which may lead to financial losses and harm the Group’s image.

Risk response: enhancing the level of protection, planned control and audit actions, universal legal regulations, phasing in the monitoring of documentation sent electronically from the Company outside the organization.

BREACH OF THE PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION RULES

Risk description: there is a risk of loss, destruction, damage, modification and accidental disclosure of personal data to unauthorized persons stemming from a lack of awareness or intentional acts by employees, and also the disclosure of personal data by entities to whom personal data have been entrusted for processing. The violation of standards in the field of personal data protection laid out in GDPR and in the Personal Data Protection Act may precipitate high financial, operational and strategic consequences, and it may generate a large probability of adverse image-related consequences

Risk response: training courses to raise newly-hired employee awareness as regards the security of personal data processing and protection and ongoing verification of information by employees, update, implementation and execution of the Security Policy - Standards for Personal Data Protection in the Group, Information Security Policy in the JSW Group and directives regarding personal data protection, continuous analysis of organizational, physical and ICT safeguards.

CYBERATTACK AGAINST THE GROUP’S INFORMATION RESOURCES

Risk description: even though the level of the applied safeguards for data processing in IT systems and outside of such systems is high, there is a risk of a cyberattack on IT resources.

Risk response: strategy containing planned actions related to information security, conducting penetration tests and audits. A Cybersecurity Team has been appointed, the Information Security Policy in the JSW Group was implemented along with the attachment “OT Cybersecurity in the JSW Group”.

DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN THE ORGANIZATION AND THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

Risk description: an improper organizational structure may cause delays in the execution of business processes, limitations in internal and external communication, cause redundant performance of tasks or performance of tasks in isolation from business processes and protract the decision-making process.

Risk response: changes to the Group’s structure duly prepared legally and organizationally and the structure adjusted to current requirements and market trends trigger the materialization of consequences in the following categories: financial, operational and legal and regulatory categories.

EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERNAL REGULATIONS

Risk description: as a result of the numerous regulations implemented in the Group, there may be inconsistencies which could lead to impediments in the effective operation of the organization.

Risk response: verification and ongoing update of binding internal regulations, adherence to the Regulations for Establishing Internal Regulations in JSW.

RISK OF RECESSION IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY

Risk description: a downturn in global economies, in particular in the steel and power industries, or events causing a significant decline in demand for coal and coke, may have an adverse impact on the Group’s activity and financial performance and standing. The regulations and restrictions caused by the measures aimed at limiting the spreading of COVID-19 cause disruptions in the supply chain that may impact a number of areas of operations.The decline in demand for coal and coke or steel, or a rapid decline of prices in the market may result in a significant loss of the Group’s ability to generate profit.

Risk response: monitoring and analyzing trends on the global market for coal, coke and steel, expert studies drafted by research analysts and price trends and monitoring global price indices. At present, risk must be monitored to respond rapidly to events transpiring on the market; at the same time, the Group takes advantage of the available safeguards to mitigate financial and FX risk, etc. and it monitors the achievement of the Group’s objectives.

THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF COKE PRODUCED BY THE GROUP

Risk description: the risk of reduction in coke supply is determined by the persisting threat related to the spread of the pandemic of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Another deterioration in the epidemic situation makes it more likely that the pandemic will exert an impact on how the Group functions. Problems related to supply logistics affect the supply of coke. These problems may ensue from the renovation work on rail lines and the limited availability of rail cars, locomotives and the insufficient supply of means of road transport. There is also a risk of the quantity and quality of coke produced in the JSW KOKS coking plants being diminished, which results from the possibiliy of the availability of coal grades in JSW’s mines being limited.

Risk response: the Group’s Sales Procedure has been implemented and is used, sales reports and information on coke inventories in the Group are submitted to the Management Board.

FLUCTUATION OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND ON THE MAIN PRODUCT MARKETS

Risk description: the imbalance between supply and demand has a substantial influence on achieving the Group’s strategic objectives, it makes it necessary to look for alternatives (e.g. overseas markets). The change in the qualitative parameters stemming from current production has a substantial impact on the tonnage offtaken by the Group’s business partners, while if these parameters are not stable, this could destabilize the demand and supply mix. Limitations in coke production triggered by problems on the steel market may exert a direct impact on the volume of coking coal that is offtaken, and hence a shortfall of complete coverage of the sales of the producted quantity of coal.

Risk response: limited ability to contribute to modifying the risk on account of the source of its origin that is independent of the group, monitoring of the global market for coal and coking coal, flexibility of production and sales aligned to market conditions; rational management of coal and coke inventories; monitoring of coal/coke quality parameters.

RISK OF REDUCTION OF BLAST FURNACE PIG IRON PRODUCTION CAPACITY IN EUROPE

Risk description: the reduction of production capacities of blast furnace pig iron in Europe will materially and adversely affect the demand for coke. At the same time, there is a strong trend towards independence from external purchases of raw materials by steel producers who balance their in-house deliveries.

Risk response: detailed analysis of European and global sales markets - the purpose of current actions is to retain the current customers and an aggressive price policy focused on diversification of sales by acquiring new sales markets.

CHANGES IN THE TECHNOLOGY FOR PROCURING STEEL AFFECTING THE DEMAND FOR COKE

Risk description: steel production analyses refer to the stable share of blast furnace production in Asia, Europe and North America. The costs of raw materials and energy will drive the choice of steel production technologies applied in the long-term. Failure to keep pace with the technological changes in coke production will lead to a considerable loss of added value and will exert a significant impact on achieving the planned strategic and operational objectives.

Risk response: monitoring of the market in respect of technology changes and the level of steel production, clients’ requirements, the competition’s efforts, emphasizing the adaptation of coke’s quality to clients’ requirements, entering into long-term contracts, tapping into the synergy effect as a Group offering coke and coking coal and searching for new sales markets.

OPERATING ACTIVITY, PRODUCTION PLANNING

Risk description: the risk means that as a result of the advent of unforeseen mining and geological or market conditions, or unfavorable legal regulations, production will fall or costs will grow versus the assumptions accepted during production planning.

Risk response: monitoring and analysis of production ratios, forecasts concerning market conditions, current updating of production planning in connection with analysis of conditions existing in the areas where work is conducted, optimization of preparatory and mining operations, adaptation of internal regulations and procedures to applicable legal and regulatory rulings.

PRODUCTION CAPACITIES, EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCTION PROFITABILITY

Risk description: estimates concerning coal resources inevitably entail a certain amount of errors and to some degree depend on the geological criteria used, which may ultimately prove to be imprecise. In addition, limited technical and organizational capabilities may impact the quantity and quality of extracted coal.

Risk response: updating production planning on an ongoing basis, monitoring and analyzing production ratios, adapting production to the economic conditions, optimizing preparatory and mining works, monitoring and analyzing working standards, standardizing machinery and equipment, analysis on an ongoing basis of the threats affecting the level of extraction.

LIMITATIONS IN PRODUCTION AND MANAGING MINING MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT

Risk description: the materialization of risk is almost certain having regard for the high amount of machinery involved in the production process, with the consequence being the possibility of stoppage caused by a breakdown of machinery, the need to rebuild the machinery or the improper selection of technical solutions for the prevailing geological and mining conditions.

Risk response: supervision of the performance of the Technical and Economic Plan and contracts related to renovation, maintenance and checkup of machinery and equipment, monitoring of, and reporting on, the production process, supervision over the operation of machinery and equipment, supervision and control of agreements for the supply of machinery and mining equipment.

BUSINESS CONTINUITY AND INCIDENT MANAGEMENT

Risk description: the risk that production or its level will be disturbed as a result of improper production management, the application of inappropriate production technologies, bad employee management, higher level of natural hazards than projected resulting in decisions by the supervisory authorities imposing the complete or temporary discontinuation of production.

Risk response: monitoring of output indicators for the purposes of continuous updating of production plans, running production plans in line with investment plans, setting schedules for the performance of mining works, regular analysis of geological and mining conditions, optimization of preparatory and mining work, continuous improvement of management’s competence and staff’s qualifications.

SECURING AND MANAGING COAL RESERVES

Risk description: resources may not be available when they are needed or if they are available their extraction at a competitive cost in a given period may not be plausible. The Group may not be able to assess the geological structure of deposits, the quality of resources and/or the geological and engineering parameters of the rock mass precisely or it may do so erroneously in regions with prospects. The effectiveness of the process of acquiring and managing reserves may also be limited by amendments to the law.

Risk response: optimizing the portfolio of investment projects related to securing access to resources, updating and preparing technical designs for the mining of seams and parts of deposits giving consideration to the aspect involving technical and economic analysis, the conduct of testing work when doing exploration of the quality of the reserves and the geological and engineering conditions, efforts to plan and monitor undertakings, utilizing the opinions of experts and external advisors, execution of key projects in accordance with the developed and implemented methodology, strict supervision over the execution of key projects by Steering Committees.

COMMODITY PRICE RISK

Risk description: the volatility of prices for raw materials, foreign exchange rates, labor costs translate into movement (growth) in the prices of the products purchased. In the long-term, commodity prices are also influenced by personnel, transport, electricity costs, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and ever more difficult access to external sources of financing of operations. Price growth of commodities purchased relative to those assumed in the TEP may result in limited purchasing finance capabilities.

Risk response: monitoring, market analyses, the terms and conditions of contracts pertaining to supply of materials and equipment: the concluded contracts allow for negotiations of prices, payment terms and the so-called substitute purchases.

FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RISK – EUR/PLN AND USD/PLN EXCHANGE RATE FLUCTUATIONS

Risk description: the Group faces significant foreign exchange risk due to its foreign currency exposure which may affect the future cash flows and the financial result. Foreign exchange risk in the Group originates from the sale of its products: indexed to and denominated in USD and EUR.

Risk response: the JSW Group’s FX Risk Management Policy is in effect in the Group; the Financial Risk Committee (“KRF”) has been established. The Group hedges its exposure at the level of plans and contracts, by applying the hedging ratios adopted by the JSW Management Board; a system supporting foreign exchange risk management has been implemented, hedge accounting for cash flows has been implemented, the Group’s planned exposure is hedeged.

INTEREST RATE RISK

Risk description: The Group is exposed mainly to the risk of interest rate fluctuation in respect of the assets associated with the holding of investment certificates, cash and cash equivalents, deposits, loans and borrowings and lease liabilities. High inflation, strong wage pressure and the continuation of robust economic growth are factors that are conducive to the Monetary Policy Council continuing the series of interest rate hikes.

Risk response: ongoing analysis of the exposure to interest rate risk, the financial market risk and potential interest rate risk hedging measures resulting from the acquired financing; monitoring JSW’s overall net position, implementation of hedge accounting; implementation of the JSW Interest Rate Risk Management Policy , including the relevant procedure; ongoing analysis of market rate levels and market forecasts for interest rates. At present, JSW does not hedge interest rate risk with derivatives.

CREDIT RISK FOR FINANCIAL RECEIVABLES

Risk description: credit risk for financial receivables in the Group focuses on the following areas: cash and bank term deposits, derivatives and financial receivables. Credit risk for financial receivables may arise from their concentration or impeded enforcement.

Risk response: pursuing a procedure for investing available cash and a procedure for FX risk management in the Group, the Policy for Investing Available Cash has been implemented according to which the Group invests its cash in banks with an established market position.

LIQUIDITY AND WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

Risk description: as cash flow and the level of cash generated are highly dependent on coal and coke sale prices, and also in connection with the constantly high level of investment expenditures, the Group is exposed to liquidity risk in the case of considerable deterioration of market circumstances.

Risk response: maintaining the appropriate level of long-term funding sources, taking advantage of deferred payments to the Social Insurance Institution, amortization of financing under the agreements with PFR and the Consortium of Financial Institutions, liquidity monitoring, Liquidity Management Policy and procedure in the Group, daily monitoring of available cash for the upcoming month, updating the financial model and tools to forecast liquidity as part of the Liquidity Policy and procedure, liquidity forecasts.

GROUP’S GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY THROUGH MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Risk description: the major risks in M&A processes appear in the following areas: financial, organizational, operational, strategic, market, political and environmental / ecological risks stemming from the tenets of JSW’s Climate Policy for 2020-2030 along with the scenarios described for the switchover to a low-emission economy, they may potentially have a substantial influence on the Group’s market value and carrying value in the event of pursuing or finalizing misguided acquisition projects or committing significant errors when running these processes.

Risk response: the Group uses the support of external professional advisors. Ensuring technical and organizational conditions and the appropriate financial support to obtain the planned synergy effects contributing to growing value.

IDENTIFICATION OF STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

Risk description: risk associated with the Group failing to achieve its targets and objectives in its investment projects concerning development opportunities, or expansion into current and new markets. On top of investment projects related to the Group’s core business, i.e. extracting coal, the Group plans to develop its business in terms of producing mining machines and subassemblies, generating electricity and heat and producing hydrocarbons. This risk may be the consequence of the erroneously defined major strategic assumptions or badly estimated benefits and directions of growth.

Risk response: periodic analysis and update of the Group’s strategy, running and monitoring on an ongoing basis its project strategy accepted in 2018 according to the Project and Program Management Methodology in the Group, monitoring the market and analyzing potential business projects

STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PROJECTS

Risk description: on account of the long-term cycle for the duration of key strategic projects, there is a possibility of deviation concerning execution deadlines, the physical investment and financial scope having regard for geological and mining conditions, the work done by external companies, changes in the projected macroeconomic factors, collapse of the market conditions for coal.

Risk response: implementation of a project management methodology along with the establishment of the appropriate project management structures, preparation of strategic project documentation considering all the possible identifiable aspects along with an economic analysis, periodic reports on the execution of the investment, constant supervision over project execution.

RESOURCE ALLOCATION
– BUSINESS PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

Risk description: the risk that the Group will not maximize its business results on account of sub-optimal resource allocation or the adoption of an inappropriate structure of business segments in the context of strategy execution.

Risk response: monitoring of the market concerning possible investment purchases, availability of services, innovative solutions, monitoring of the market and the situation caused by sudden broad-impact events and making fast decisions mitigating the impact of these events on the Group.

EFFECTIVENESS OF STRATEGIC PLANNING AND MONITORING THE ACHIEVEMENT OF OBJECTIVES

Risk description: risk associated with projections and planning entails the threat that the projections constituting the basis for making decisions on starting the investment projects planned by the Group will not materialize as a result of changes in the economic, legal or social environment.

Risk response: constant supervision over the execution of the Strategy, monthly control of budget performance, regular meetings between managers and the Management Board on the performance of tasks, periodic presentation concerning the achievement of individual strategic objectives during meetings of the JSW Supervisory Board’s Strategy and Development Committee, implementation and update of the JSW Group’s Strategy in 2020-2030 and procedures to coordinate efforts.

EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL INVESTMENTS AND STRATEGIC TRANSACTIONS

Risk description: risk of exposure to unprofitable, misguided or excessively risk investments and transactions on account of an improperly conducted assessment of potential transactions, comprehensive analysis at the pre-transaction phase or making erroneous transaction decisions during the various stages of the transaction in progress.

Risk response: support from reputable and experienced external advisors and experts in the transaction profitability analysis process, supervision over the processes by the Management Board and project teams.

The risks described above are not the only factors to which JSW Group is exposed. Additional risk factors that are currently unknown or that are currently seen as negligible may also have a material adverse impact on the Group's operations, results and financial situation.